Z8350 vs z3735f


Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom Z3735F

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score Significantly newer manufacturing process Newer Supports dynamic frequency scaling Significantly better turbo clock speed Higher GPU clock speed Better overclocked clock speed (Water)
22.5 vs 21.3 More than 5% better 3DMark06 CPU score
14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Jan, 2016 vs Apr, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
646 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 30% better turbo clock speed
311 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 55% higher GPU clock speed
1.83 GHz vs 1.44 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Intel x5-Z8350

Report a correction

Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction

VS VS

cpuboss.com

Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head

► remove

The Intel Atom Z3735F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735D, the Z3735F comes in a different BGA package.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735F competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

► remove

The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in February 2016. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.92 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8350 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801. Compared to the older x5-Z8300, the Z8350 offers 80 MHz higher boost clock and therefore a similar performance. See our X5-Z8300 site for detailed benchmarks.

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

min: 817     avg: 901     median: 902 (10%)     max: 999 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642817
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058847
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.4404884
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474921
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352938
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4364999

min: 2575     avg: 2939.2     median: 2978 (5%)     max: 3130 Points

Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.44042575
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43522897
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422963
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582994
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.44743076
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43643130

wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *

min: 1079     avg: 1114.7     median: 1099 (13%)     max: 1165 seconds

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42421079.16
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431099.63
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431165.39

wPrime 2.0x - 32m *

min: 34     avg: 35.6     median: 35 (7%)     max: 36 seconds

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424234.332
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364335.664
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.364336.892

WinRAR - Result

min: 1595     avg: 1635     median: 1635 (19%)     max: 1675 KB/s

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431595
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431675

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2

6.8 fps (0%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42426.79
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36436.83
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36436.83

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1

min: 34     avg: 35.6     median: 35 (13%)     max: 36 fps

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424234.95
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.364335.9
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364336.06

TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB

0.4 GB/s (18%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42420.0857
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.0874
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.876

TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB

0.1 GB/s (4%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42420.133
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.135
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.136

TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB

0.6 GB/s (3%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42420.612
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.621
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.622

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

min: 27     avg: 36.1     median: 27 (6%)     max: 53 Seconds

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364327.452
Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424227.452
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.364353.333

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

min: 61     avg: 79.1     median: 61 (3%)     max: 114 Seconds

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364361.176
Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424261.176
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.3643114.909

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *

min: 1566     avg: 1747     median: 1566 (7%)     max: 2108 Seconds

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431566.11
Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42421566.11
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432108.72

3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080

min: 11980     avg: 12961.3     median: 12748 (15%)     max: 14156 Points

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen

min: 12499     avg: 14777.8     median: 15281 (18%)     max: 16050 Points

min: 8436     avg: 12569.7     median: 14078 (16%)     max: 15195 Points

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50588436
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.464214078
Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 15195

min: 929     avg: 1036.3     median: 1071 (3%)     max: 1109 Points

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058929
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46421071
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022THD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 400 / 800 MHz 20.19.15.45491109

1588 Points (5%)

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50581588

3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440

1126 Points (14%)

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 1126

3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics 2560x1440

1151 Points (24%)

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 1151

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream

min: 2139     avg: 2243.5     median: 2243 (18%)     max: 2348 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432139
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432348

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory

min: 1877     avg: 1956.5     median: 1956 (18%)     max: 2036 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431877
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432036

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point

min: 2059     avg: 2161     median: 2161 (4%)     max: 2263 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432059
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432263

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer

min: 2338     avg: 2477     median: 2477 (4%)     max: 2616 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432338
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432616

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score

min: 2128     avg: 2238.5     median: 2238 (5%)     max: 2349 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432128
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432349

Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score

min: 2018     avg: 2166.1     median: 2191 (3%)     max: 2213 Points

min: 2130     avg: 2246.8     median: 2289 (3%)     max: 2332 Points

Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43522130
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422159
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.44742289
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582324
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43642332

Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score

min: 767     avg: 785     median: 786 (16%)     max: 801 Points

min: 709     avg: 754.6     median: 760 (16%)     max: 796 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642709
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352726
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474760
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058782
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4364796

Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score

min: 5300     avg: 5410.7     median: 5326 (2%)     max: 5606 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46425300
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43645326
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50585606

Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score

min: 1980     avg: 2227     median: 2264 (8%)     max: 2399 Points

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 1980
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422177
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582352
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43642399

Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score

min: 836     avg: 887.8     median: 890 (15%)     max: 934 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642836
Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 879
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058902
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4364934

Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score

min: 880     avg: 903     median: 903 (14%)     max: 926 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642880
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058926

Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score

min: 2296     avg: 2393     median: 2393 (4%)     max: 2490 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422296
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582490

min: 5047     avg: 5907.7     median: 5630 (9%)     max: 7229 ms

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096  Chrome Version 565047.4
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352 Edge 385508.9
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474 Edge 385630.4
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.44046122
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058 Edge 447229.9

min: 4722     avg: 6393.2     median: 6494 (12%)     max: 7265 Points

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058 Edge 444722
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.44046343
Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096  Chrome Version 566494
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352 Edge 387142
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474 Edge 387265

Vellamo 3.x - Metal

1221 Points (33%)

Medion Lifetab S10345HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 1221

Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta

1379 Points (31%)

Medion Lifetab S10345HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 1379

Vellamo 3.x - Browser

3069 Points (41%)

Medion Lifetab S10345HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 3069

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score

min: 32624     avg: 33917     median: 33917 (34%)     max: 35210 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score

3376 Points (28%)

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 3376
- - * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

#0 checking url part for id 5966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8088 +0s ... 0s

#2 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:08:34 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.177s ... 0.178s

#4 min, max, avg, median took s +0.226s ... 0.403s

#5 return log +0.008s ... 0.411s

www.notebookcheck.net

Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head

► remove

The Intel Atom Z3735F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735D, the Z3735F comes in a different BGA package.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735F competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

► remove

The Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in February 2016. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.92 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8350 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801. Compared to the older x5-Z8300, the Z8350 offers 80 MHz higher boost clock and therefore a similar performance. See our X5-Z8300 site for detailed benchmarks.

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

► remove

The Intel Celeron N3350 is a dual-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced mid 2016. It runs at 1.1 - 2.4 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi-Core Burst max 2.3 GHz) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N3450 with 2 CPU cores and a clock between 1.1-2.4 GHz should depend a lot on the cooling solution. If the chip can maintain its Boost clock, the N3450 should be about 20-30 percent faster than the old N2840 (Braswell) and compete with an Celeron 2955U (Haswell, 2x 1.4 GHz). This means the processor is only suited for low demanding daily tasks (office, browsing).

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

min: 817     avg: 901     median: 902 (10%)     max: 999 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642817
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058847
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.4404884
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474921
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352938
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4364999

min: 2575     avg: 2939.2     median: 2978 (5%)     max: 3130 Points

Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.44042575
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43522897
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422963
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582994
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.44743076
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43643130

wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *

min: 1079     avg: 1114.7     median: 1099 (13%)     max: 1165 seconds

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42421079.16
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431099.63
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431165.39

wPrime 2.0x - 32m *

min: 34     avg: 35.6     median: 35 (7%)     max: 36 seconds

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424234.332
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364335.664
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.364336.892

WinRAR - Result

min: 1595     avg: 1635     median: 1635 (19%)     max: 1675 KB/s

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431595
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431675

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2

6.8 fps (0%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42426.79
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36436.83
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36436.83

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1

min: 34     avg: 35.6     median: 35 (13%)     max: 36 fps

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424234.95
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.364335.9
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364336.06

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset

0.6 fps (2%)

Jumper EZbook 3HD Graphics 5004096 450 /  MHz 45900.63

TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB

0.4 GB/s (18%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42420.0857
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.0874
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.876

0.1 GB/s (4%)

Jumper EZbook 3HD Graphics 5004096 450 /  MHz 45900.077

TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB

0.1 GB/s (4%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42420.133
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.135
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.136

0.1 GB/s (4%)

Jumper EZbook 3HD Graphics 5004096 450 /  MHz 45900.108

TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB

0.6 GB/s (3%)

Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42420.612
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.621
Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36430.622

0.7 GB/s (3%)

Jumper EZbook 3HD Graphics 5004096 450 /  MHz 45900.651

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

min: 27     avg: 36.1     median: 27 (6%)     max: 53 Seconds

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364327.452
Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424227.452
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.364353.333

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

min: 61     avg: 79.1     median: 61 (3%)     max: 114 Seconds

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.364361.176
Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.424261.176
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.3643114.909

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *

min: 1566     avg: 1747     median: 1566 (7%)     max: 2108 Seconds

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431566.11
Lenovo Ideapad 100S 80R2HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048  10.18.10.42421566.11
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432108.72

min: 11556     avg: 12344     median: 12344 (8%)     max: 13132 Points

3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080

min: 11980     avg: 12961.3     median: 12748 (15%)     max: 14156 Points

min: 11665     avg: 12041.5     median: 12041 (14%)     max: 12418 Points

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen

min: 12499     avg: 14777.8     median: 15281 (18%)     max: 16050 Points

min: 8436     avg: 12569.7     median: 14078 (16%)     max: 15195 Points

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50588436
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.464214078
Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 15195

min: 929     avg: 1036.3     median: 1071 (3%)     max: 1109 Points

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058929
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46421071
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022THD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 400 / 800 MHz 20.19.15.45491109

1588 Points (5%)

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50581588

3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440

1126 Points (14%)

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 1126

3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics 2560x1440

1151 Points (24%)

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 1151

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream

min: 2139     avg: 2243.5     median: 2243 (18%)     max: 2348 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432139
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432348

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory

min: 1877     avg: 1956.5     median: 1956 (18%)     max: 2036 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36431877
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432036

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point

min: 2059     avg: 2161     median: 2161 (4%)     max: 2263 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432059
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432263

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer

min: 2338     avg: 2477     median: 2477 (4%)     max: 2616 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432338
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432616

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score

min: 2128     avg: 2238.5     median: 2238 (5%)     max: 2349 Points

Lenovo Miix 3 8HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 620 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432128
ODYS Winpad V10HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 300-646 /  MHz 10.18.10.36432349

Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score

min: 2018     avg: 2166.1     median: 2191 (3%)     max: 2213 Points

min: 2130     avg: 2246.8     median: 2289 (3%)     max: 2332 Points

Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43522130
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422159
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.44742289
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582324
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43642332

Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score

min: 767     avg: 785     median: 786 (16%)     max: 801 Points

min: 709     avg: 754.6     median: 760 (16%)     max: 796 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642709
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352726
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474760
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058782
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4364796

Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score

min: 5300     avg: 5410.7     median: 5326 (2%)     max: 5606 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46425300
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43645326
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50585606

Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score

min: 1980     avg: 2227     median: 2264 (8%)     max: 2399 Points

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 1980
Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422177
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582352
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.43642399

Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score

min: 836     avg: 887.8     median: 890 (15%)     max: 934 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642836
Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 879
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058902
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196QHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4364934

Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score

min: 880     avg: 903     median: 903 (14%)     max: 926 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4642880
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058926

Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score

min: 2296     avg: 2393     median: 2393 (4%)     max: 2490 Points

Medion Akoya E2228T-MD61250HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.46422296
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.50582490

min: 5047     avg: 5907.7     median: 5630 (9%)     max: 7229 ms

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096  Chrome Version 565047.4
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352 Edge 385508.9
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474 Edge 385630.4
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.44046122
HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058 Edge 447229.9

min: 255     avg: 370.2     median: 299 (3%)     max: 627 ms

min: 4722     avg: 6393.2     median: 6494 (12%)     max: 7265 Points

HP x2 210 G2HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)4096 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.5058 Edge 444722
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICRHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 500 /  MHz 20.19.15.44046343
Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096  Chrome Version 566494
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4352 Edge 387142
ODYS Vario Pro 12HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)2048 200-500 /  MHzSingle-Channel 20.19.15.4474 Edge 387265

Vellamo 3.x - Metal

1221 Points (33%)

Medion Lifetab S10345HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 1221

Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta

1379 Points (31%)

Medion Lifetab S10345HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 1379

Vellamo 3.x - Browser

3069 Points (41%)

Medion Lifetab S10345HD Graphics (Bay Trail)2048 3069

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score

min: 32624     avg: 33917     median: 33917 (34%)     max: 35210 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score

3376 Points (28%)

Teclast Tbook 10sHD Graphics (Cherry Trail)4096 3376

Power Consumption - Prime95 V28,10 Stress Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *

8.1 Watt (2%)

Jumper EZbook 3HD Graphics 5004096 450 /  MHz 45908.1

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *

6.7 Watt (1%)

Jumper EZbook 3HD Graphics 5004096 450 /  MHz 45906.7
- - * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

www.notebookcheck.net

Intel Atom Z3735F vs. Intel Atom x5-Z8350 Specs & Speed

TechnicalsAtom Z3735FAtom x5-Z8350
Dimensions (2D)17x17 mm17x17 mm
Conflict Free?11
# CPU Cores44
Threads/Core44
Frequency (GHz)1.33 GHz1.44 GHz
Cache (MB)2
Cache L2 (MB)2
Instructions Width (bits)6464
Lithography Process (nm)22 nm14 nm
Max RAM2 GB2 GB
RAM TypesDDR3L-RS 1333DDR3L-RS 1600
# Memory Channels11
Memory Bandwidth (GB/Sec)10.6GB/s12.8GB/s
Max CPU Temp.90
PCI-E Version2
PCI-E Configurations1x1
PCI-E Max Lanes #1
Compatible SocketsUTFCBGA592UTFCBGA592
Intel Virtualization (VTX)YesYes
Intel 64YesYes
Intel ID ProtectYes
Intel AES New InstructionsYes

Intel Atom Z3735F vs. Intel Atom x5-Z8350 Specs & Speed Benchmarks

CPU Speed

These tests are designed to stress the CPU components of the processor

Geekbench 4 Multi, Higher is better

Geekbench 4 Single, Higher is better

Memory Bandwidth (GB/Sec), Higher is better

Performance/Price (Value)

Some of the same tests as above, but shown as a relation to the price. This shows what performance you get for each additional dollar spent. The higher the score, and the more value you get for your money

Geekbench 4 Multi / Price, Higher is better

www.ubergizmo.com

Intel Atom Z3735F vs AMD FX 8350

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Much better performance per watt Much lower typical power consumption Has a built-in GPU Significantly newer manufacturing process Much lower annual home energy cost Much higher Maximum operating temperature Much lower annual commercial energy cost Newer Much more l2 cache Much higher clock speed Much higher turbo clock speed Is unlocked Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) Much better PassMark (Single core) score Much better PassMark score More cores Much more l2 cache per core Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) Significantly better performance per dollar More threads
60.81 pt/W vs 5.72 pt/W More than 10.5x better performance per watt
1.79W vs 159.66W 89.3x lower typical power consumption
Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
0.53 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 105.9x lower annual home energy cost
90 °C vs 61 °C Around 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
1.93 $/year vs 159.62 $/year 82.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Apr, 2014 vs Oct, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 3x higher clock speed
4.2 GHz vs 1.83 GHz More than 2.2x higher turbo clock speed
Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
4.69 GHz vs 1.63 GHz Around 3x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
1,525 vs 350 More than 4.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
9,134 vs 908 More than 10x better PassMark score
8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
8.79 GHz vs 1.83 GHz More than 4.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
8.15 pt/$ vs 7.87 pt/$ Around 5% better performance per dollar
8 vs 4 Twice as many threads

PassMark (Single Core)

Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction

AMD FX 8350

Report a correction

VS VS

cpuboss.com

Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom Z3735G

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Significantly newer manufacturing process Higher turbo clock speed Newer Much better 3DMark06 CPU score Supports dynamic frequency scaling Significantly better turbo clock speed Higher GPU clock speed Better overclocked clock speed (Water)
14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
1.92 GHz vs 1.58 GHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Jan, 2016 vs Apr, 2014 Release date over 1 years later
25.4 vs 22.5 Around 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
646 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 30% better turbo clock speed
311 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 55% higher GPU clock speed
1.83 GHz vs 1.44 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Intel x5-Z8350

Report a correction

Intel Atom Z3735G

Report a correction

VS VS

cpuboss.com


Смотрите также