N4200 vs n3450
Intel Pentium N4200 против Celeron N3450
Сведения о типе (для десктопов или ноутбуков) и архитектуре Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450, а также о времени начала продаж и стоимости на тот момент.
Место в рейтинге производительности
Соотношение цена-качество (0-100)
3.11
3.33
Тип
Для ноутбуков
Для ноутбуков
Серия
Intel Pentium
Intel Celeron
Кодовое название архитектуры
Apollo Lake
Apollo Lake
Дата выхода
1 сентября 2016
1 сентября 2016
Цена на момент выхода
161$
107$
Количественные параметры Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450: число ядер и потоков, тактовые частоты, техпроцесс, объем кэша и состояние блокировки множителя. Косвенным образом говорят о производительности Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450, хотя для точной оценки необходимо рассмотреть результаты тестов.
Максимальная частота
2.50 ГГц
2.20 ГГц
Технологический процесс
14 нм
14 нм
Максимальная температура ядра
105 °C
105 °C
Параметры, отвечающие за совместимость Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 с остальными компонентами компьютера. Пригодятся например при выборе конфигурации будущего компьютера или для апгрейда существующего.
Макс. число процессоров в конфигурации
1
1
Энергопотребление (TDP)
6 Вт
6 Вт
Здесь перечислены поддерживаемые Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 технологические решения и наборы дополнительных инструкций. Такая информация понадобится, если от процессора требуется поддержка конкретных технологий.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
+
+
Встроенные в Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 технологии, повышающие безопасность системы, например, предназначенные для защиты от взлома.
Перечислены поддерживаемые Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 технологии, ускоряющие работу виртуальных машин.
Типы, максимальный объем и количество каналов оперативной памяти, поддерживаемой Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450.
Типы оперативной памяти
DDR3L / LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT / s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT / s
DDR3L / LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT / s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT / s
Допустимый объем памяти
8 Гб
8 Гб
Количество каналов памяти
2
2
Общие параметры встроенных в Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 видеокарт.
Видеоядро
Intel HD Graphics 505 (200 - 750 МГц)
Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 МГц)
Объем видеопамяти
8 Гб
8 Гб
Максимальная частота видеоядра
750 МГц
700 МГц
Количество исполняющих блоков
18
12
Поддерживаемые встроенными в Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 видеокартами интерфейсы и подключения.
Максимальное количество мониторов
3
3
Поддерживаемые встроенными в Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 видеокартами API, в том числе их версии.
Поддерживаемые Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 периферийные устройства и способы их подключения.
Ревизия PCI Express
2.0
2.0
Количество линий PCI-Express
6
6
Ревизия USB
2.0 / 3.0
2.0 / 3.0
Общее количество портов SATA
2
2
Максимальное число портов SATA 6 Gb/s
2
2
Это результаты тестов Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 на производительность в неигровых бенчмарках. Общий балл выставляется от 0 до 100, где 100 соответствует самому быстрому на данный момент процессору.
Pentium N4200 4.31 +10.2% Pentium N4200 1653 +16.8% Pentium N4200 5217 +31.8% Pentium N4200 1396 +16.1% Pentium N4200 4595 +16.1% Pentium N4200 4377 +10.7%Соответствие Pentium N4200 и Celeron N3450 системным требованиям игр. Помните, что официальные требования разработчиков не всегда совпадают с данными реальных тестов.
На 10.2% быстрее в синтетических тестах
Дешевле ($107 против $161)
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - самое первое (1996 год) расширение инструкций класса SIMD для десктопных процессоров Intel, работает с 64-битными регистрами)
SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - расширение инструкций класса SIMD, работает со 128-битными регистрами)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - аппаратное ускорение шифрования и дешифрования AES)
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology - защищает систему от вирусов и руткитов, находящихся в BIOS или загрузочном секторе)
technical.city
Intel Pentium N4200 vs Celeron N3450
Comparing Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
Value for money (0-100)
3.11
3.33
Series
Intel Pentium
Intel Celeron
Achitecture codename
Apollo Lake
Apollo Lake
Release date
1 September 2016
1 September 2016
Launch price (MSRP)
$161
$107
Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Maximum frequency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Maximum core temperature
105 °C
105 °C
Information on Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
1
1
Socket
FCBGA1296
FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)
6 Watt
6 Watt
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
+
+
Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450.
Supported memory types
DDR3L / LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT / s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT / s
DDR3L / LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT / s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT / s
Maximum memory size
8 GB
8 GB
General parameters of GPUs integrated into Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450.
Integrated graphics
Intel HD Graphics 505 (200 - 750 MHz)
Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)
Max video memory
8 GB
8 GB
Graphics max frequency
750 MHz
700 MHz
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported
3
3
APIs supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450.
Max number of PCIe lanes
6
6
USB revision
2.0 / 3.0
2.0 / 3.0
Total number of SATA ports
2
2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports
2
2
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Pentium N4200 4.31 +10.2% Pentium N4200 1653 +16.8% Pentium N4200 5217 +31.8% Pentium N4200 1396 +16.1% Pentium N4200 4595 +16.1% Pentium N4200 4377 +10.7%Let's see how good Pentium N4200 and Celeron N3450 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
10.2% faster in synthetic tests
Cheaper ($107 vs $161)
MMX (MultiMedia Extensions - the very first (1996) SIMD instruction expansion for Intel desktop CPUs, works with 64-bit registers)
SSE (Streaming SIMD Instructions - a SIMD instruction extension working with 128-bit registers)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology - protects the system against viruses and rootkits residing in BIOS or in a boot sector)
technical.city
UserBenchmark: Intel Celeron N3450 vs Pentium N4200
| Workstation 16% |
| Workstation 14% |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed | 25.8 % | Slightly faster effective speed.+8% | 23.8 % |
| 1-Core Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed | 46.4 Pts | Slightly faster single-core speed.+14% | 40.6 Pts | |||
| 2-Core Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed | 89.2 Pts | Slightly faster dual-core speed.+12% | 79.7 Pts | |||
| 4-Core Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed | 160 Pts | Slightly faster quad-core speed.+7% | 149 Pts | |||
| 8-Core Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed | 161 Pts | Slightly faster octa-core speed.+8% | 149 Pts | |||
| 64-Core Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed | 159 Pts | Slightly faster 64-core speed.+7% | 148 Pts |
| 1-Core OC Single Core Mixed Speed | 52.4 Pts | Slightly faster OC single-core speed.+14% | 45.9 Pts | |||
| 2-Core OC Dual Core Mixed Speed | 101 Pts | Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.+15% | 88 Pts | |||
| 4-Core OC Quad Core Mixed Speed | 200 Pts | Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.+14% | 175 Pts | |||
| 8-Core OC Octa Core Mixed Speed | 200 Pts | Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.+14% | 176 Pts | |||
| 64-Core OC Multi Core Mixed Speed | 199 Pts | Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.+13% | 176 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 20,672,828 CPUs tested.| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) | 0.04 % | Hugely higher market share.+100% | 0.02 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating | 61 % | Slightly more popular.+9% | 56 % |
| Burst Frequency Burst Frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.20 GHz | ||||
| Embedded Options Available Embedded Options Available | Yes | No | ||||
| Recommended Price Recommended Customer Price | $161.00 | $107.00 | ||||
| Processor Graphics Processor Graphics ‡ | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | ||||
| Graphics Burst Frequency Graphics Burst Frequency | 750.00 MHz | 700.00 MHz | ||||
| More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
If you're after low-power computing then this is a good, basic processor to get work done. Based on the 2016 14nm Apollo Lake architecture it is designed for mobile efficiency and comes in a range of laptops from budget to mid-tier. It uses about 4 to 6 watts under load (yes, four to six whole watts) and generally idles under 2 watts. It has four cores with four threads and has a 1.1GHz base clock with a 2.2GHz boost, with the included HD 500 series graphics boasting 12 execution units running at up to 700MHz, although information regarding this is limited given its budget application. If you're processing data then forget anything with this. Although possible, it'll take forever as you're limited to 256k of L1 and 2MB of L2 cache - no L3 at all. The included graphics won't help you here either. For everyday processing, or a cheap laptop for the kids, this is a decent processor but throw more than 2 or 3 basic tasks at it and it flounders. Anything more complex than everyday word processing, internet and multimedia is beyond it, but given that's what the majority of users will be doing this isn't an issue. The bonus? Ultra-light, thin and quiet latops with passive cooling and sub- $250USD price points. Not bad! [Jul '19 boingk]
MORE DETAILS
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming Desktop Workstation CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USBHow it works
- - Download and run UserBenchMark.
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- - See speed test results from other users.
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
- - Share your opinion by voting.
cpu.userbenchmark.com
Intel Pentium N4200 vs. Intel Celeron N3450 - Benchmark & CPU Comparison
| Intel Pentium N4200 | Intel Celeron N3450 | |
| 1.10 GHz | Frequency | 1.10 GHz |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 2.20 GHz |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.20 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2 MB | Cache | 2 MB |
| Intel HD Graphics 505 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| 0.20 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.20 GHz |
| 0.75 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.70 GHz |
| 9 | GPU Generation | 9 |
| 11.2 | DirectX Version | 11.2 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| 18 | Execution units | 12 |
| Decode/Encode | Codec h364 | Decode/Encode |
| Decode | Codec JPEG | Decode |
| Decode | Codec h365 8bit | Decode |
| Decode | Codec h365 10bit | Decode |
| Decode/Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode/Encode |
| Decode | Codec VP9 | Decode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| Decode/Encode | Codec AVC | Decode/Encode |
| Apollo Lake | Architecture | Apollo Lake |
| DDR3-1866, DDR4-2400 | Memory | DDR3-1866, DDR4-2400 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| No | ECC | No |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | 2.0 |
| 6 | PCIe lanes | 6 |
| 14nm | Technology | 14nm |
| BGA 1296 | Socket | BGA 1296 |
| 6W | TDP | 6W |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q3/2016 | Release date | Q3/2016 |
| Market price | ||
back to index
www.cpu-monkey.com
Intel Core i5-4200U vs Celeron N3450
Comparing Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
Value for money (0-100)
n/d
3.33
Series
Intel Core i5
Intel Celeron
Achitecture codename
Haswell
Apollo Lake
Release date
4 June 2013
1 September 2016
Launch price (MSRP)
n/d
$107
Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Maximum frequency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
14 nm
Maximum core temperature
100 °C
105 °C
Transistor count
1,400 million
n/d
Information on Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
1
1
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
6 Watt
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
n/d
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
+
+
Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450.
Supported memory types
DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, LPDDR3-1333, LPDDR3-1600
DDR3L / LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT / s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT / s
Maximum memory size
16 GB
8 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth
25.6 GB / s
n/d
General parameters of GPUs integrated into Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450.
Integrated graphics
Intel HD Graphics 4400 (200 - 1000 MHz)
Intel HD Graphics 500 (200 - 700 MHz)
Max video memory
2 GB
8 GB
Graphics max frequency
1 GHz
700 MHz
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported
3
3
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4
n/d
Max resolution over DisplayPort
n/d
APIs supported by Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450.
Max number of PCIe lanes
12
6
USB revision
3.0
2.0 / 3.0
Total number of SATA ports
4
2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports
4
2
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
1.8 Mh/s
n/d
Let's see how good Core i5-4200U and Celeron N3450 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
77.5% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests
HyperThreading (allows one physical CPU function as two logical ones. It increases performance, since while one logical CPU is waiting for data, the second may still do useful work)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AVX2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2 - an extension to AVX, the set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
Intel 64 (64-bit Intel CPU architecture. Almost identical to AMD64, except small and rarely used nuances)
Much newer (1 September 2016 vs 4 June 2013)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 22 nm)
Less power hungry (6 vs 15 watts)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
MemoryProtectionExtensionsVersion
technical.city
Intel Pentium T4200 vs N3450
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!| CPUBoss Winner |
| 2 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 80% higher clock speed |
| 2.43 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
| 1,152 | vs | 714 | More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score |
| 2 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
| 14 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor |
| 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later |
| Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
| Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
| 12.7 pt/W | vs | 2.58 pt/W | Around 5x better performance per watt |
| 4.88W | vs | 28.44W | 5.8x lower typical power consumption |
| Jul, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2009 | Release date over 7 years later |
| 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once |
| 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads |
| 1.45 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 5.8x lower annual home energy cost |
| 5.26 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
| Intel Pentium T4200 Report a correction | Intel N3450 Report a correction |
cpuboss.com
