Intel atom z3580


Процессор Intel Atom® серии Z3580 (2 МБ кэш-памяти, до 2,33 ГГц) Спецификации продукции

Вся информация, приведенная в данном документе, может быть изменена в любое время без предварительного уведомления. Корпорация Intel сохраняет за собой право вносить изменения в цикл производства, спецификации и описания продукции в любое время без уведомления. Информация в данном документе предоставлена «как есть». Корпорация Intel не делает никаких заявлений и гарантий в отношении точности данной информации, а также в отношении характеристик, доступности, функциональных возможностей или совместимости перечисленной продукции. За дополнительной информацией о конкретных продуктах или системах обратитесь к поставщику таких систем.

Классификации Intel приведены исключительно в информационных целях и состоят из номеров классификации экспортного контроля (ECCN) и номеров Гармонизированных таможенных тарифов США (HTS). Классификации Intel должны использоваться без отсылки на корпорацию Intel и не должны трактоваться как заявления или гарантии в отношении правильности ECCN или HTS. В качестве импортера и/или экспортера ваша компания несет ответственность за определение правильной классификации вашей транзакции.

Формальные определения свойств и характеристик продукции представлены в техническом описании.

‡ Эта функция может присутствовать не во всех вычислительных системах. Свяжитесь с поставщиком, чтобы получить информацию о поддержке этой функции вашей системой или уточнить спецификацию системы (материнской платы, процессора, набора микросхем, источника питания, жестких дисков, графического контроллера, памяти, BIOS, драйверов, монитора виртуальных машин (VMM), платформенного ПО и/или операционной системы) для проверки совместимости с этой функцией. Функциональные возможности, производительность и другие преимущества этой функции могут в значительной степени зависеть от конфигурации системы.

Номера процессоров Intel® не служат мерой измерения производительности. Номера процессоров указывают на различия характеристик процессоров в пределах семейства, а не на различия между семействами процессоров. Дополнительную информацию смотрите на сайте http://www.intel.com/content/www/ru/ru/processors/processor-numbers.html.

Анонсированные артикулы (SKUs) на данный момент недоступны. Обратитесь к графе «Дата выпуска» для получения информации о доступности продукции на рынке.

Некоторые продукты могут поддерживать новые наборы инструкций AES с обновлением конфигурации процессоров, в частности, i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7-2675QM, i5-2430M/i5-2435M, i5-2410M/i5-2415M. Свяжитесь с OEM-поставщиком для получения BIOS, включающего последнее обновление конфигурации процессора.

Для процессоров с поддержкой 64-разрядных архитектур Intel® требуется поддержка технологии Intel® 64 в BIOS.

ark.intel.com

Intel Atom Z3735F vs Z3580

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Better turbo clock speed Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score Significantly higher clock speed Higher GPU clock speed Better overclocked clock speed (Air) Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score Better overclocked clock speed (Water)
646 MHz vs 533 MHz More than 20% better turbo clock speed
349,850 MB/s vs 279,850 MB/s More than 25% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
2.33 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 75% higher clock speed
457 MHz vs 311 MHz More than 45% higher GPU clock speed
2.34 GHz vs 1.63 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
2,892 vs 2,148 Around 35% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
2.33 GHz vs 1.83 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction

Intel Atom Z3580

Report a correction

VS VS

cpuboss.com

Intel Atom Z3580

older Released April, 2014

Clock speed Cores
2.33 GHz
Quad core
Has a NX bit Has virtualization support Instruction set extensions Supports dynamic frequency scaling
Yes
Yes
  1. MMX
  2. EM64T
  3. SSE4.2
  4. SSE4.1
  5. SSE
  6. SSE4
  7. AES
  8. SSE3
  9. SSE2
Yes
Architecture Number of links
FSB
1
Threads L2 cache L2 cache per core Manufacture process Max CPUs Architecture
4 threads
2 MB
0.5 MB/core
22 nm
1
x86-64
Overclocked clock speed Overclocked clock speed (Water) Overclocked clock speed (Air)
2.34 GHz
2.33 GHz
2.34 GHz
GPU Number of displays supported GPU clock speed Turbo clock speed
GPU
2
457 MHz
533 MHz
Memory controller Memory type Channels Maximum bandwidth Maximum memory size
Built-in
DDR3
Dual Channel
12,800 MB/s
4,096 MB

Report a correction

cpuboss.com

Intel Atom Z3775 vs Z3580

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score Significantly better turbo clock speed Significantly higher clock speed Higher GPU clock speed Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water)
381,000 MB/s vs 349,850 MB/s Around 10% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
667 MHz vs 533 MHz More than 25% better turbo clock speed
2.33 GHz vs 1.47 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
457 MHz vs 311 MHz More than 45% higher GPU clock speed
2.33 GHz vs 1.47 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Intel Atom Z3775

Report a correction

Intel Atom Z3580

Report a correction

VS VS

cpuboss.com

Intel Atom Z3745 vs Z3580

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score Significantly higher clock speed Supports dynamic frequency scaling Higher GPU clock speed Better overclocked clock speed (Air) Slightly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) Newer

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Z3745 vs the Z3580.

349,850 MB/s vs 283,100 MB/s Around 25% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
2.33 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 75% higher clock speed
Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
457 MHz vs 311 MHz More than 45% higher GPU clock speed
2.34 GHz vs 1.86 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
2,892 vs 2,395 More than 20% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
2.33 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Apr, 2014 vs Jan, 2014 Release date 3 months later

Intel Atom Z3745

Report a correction

Intel Atom Z3580

Report a correction

VS VS

cpuboss.com

Benchmarking Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML with Intel Atom Z3580 SoC and 4GB of RAM

We got our hands on a retail unit of the range-topping version of Asus ZenFone 2 with 4GB of RAM, so we decided to put it through our set of benchmark tests. The smartphone packs a beefier chipset, which aims to compete with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 family.

Asus ZenFone 2 with 4GB of RAM packs an Intel Atom Z3580 SoC with 2.3 GHz quad-core CPU, coupled with PowerVR G6430 GPU. For comparison, Asus ZenFone 2 with 2GB of RAM features Intel Atom Z3560 with 1.8GHz quad-core CPU.

Price-wise, the 4GB ZenFone 2 sits closely to the hordes of Qualcomm Snapdragon 615-equipped mid-rangers. However, the device’s chipset performance puts it in the same league as many flagship devices. Therefore, we’ve lined up an eclectic mix of smartphones for our benchmark comparison.

Geekbench 3 is a benchmark that focuses on raw CPU performance. On this instance, the 4GB ZenFone 2 did considerably better than its 2GB, relative, but still couldn’t quite match the oomph of its high-end octa-core rivals.

GeekBench 3

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 5215
  • Meizu m1 note 3988
  • HTC One M9 3761
  • LG G Flex2 3604
  • LG G4 3509
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 3386
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 2923
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 2922
  • Sony Xperia Z3 2860
  • OnePlus One 2663
  • Oppo R7 2620
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 2451
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 2423
  • LG G3 2370
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 2336
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1468

Antutu 5 adds RAM and storage speed into the mix and is an indication of the overall performance of the device. We found the 4GB ZenFone 2 rubbing shoulders with many of today’s heavy hitters in the Android real. Similarly priced mid-range rivals on the other hand, didn’t even come close to its result.

AnTuTu 5

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 69396
  • HTC One M9 51427
  • LG G4 49295
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 48489
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 48361
  • LG G Flex2 47680
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 45530
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 42301
  • LG G3 42038
  • Sony Xperia Z3 40393
  • Meizu m1 note 39224
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 34491
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 29907
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 21562

The trend continues with the Basemark OS II benchmark. Once again the high-end Asus ZenFone 2 posted a stellar score. As expected, its single and multi-core results came out considerably better than those displayed by the 2GB version.

Basemark OS II

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 1769
  • LG G Flex2 1601
  • HTC One M9 1526
  • LG G3 1327
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 1267
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 1202
  • OnePlus One 1196
  • Sony Xperia Z3 1109
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 1094
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 922
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 843
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 814
  • Meizu m1 note 715
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 600

Basemark OS II (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 3497
  • LG G Flex2 2528
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 2426
  • HTC One M9 2401
  • LG G3 2267
  • OnePlus One 2213
  • Sony Xperia Z3 2114
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 1891
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 1853
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 1819
  • Meizu m1 note 1754
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 1651
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1514
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 1462

Basemark OS II (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 16986
  • Meizu m1 note 12848
  • OnePlus One 10234
  • HTC One M9 10128
  • LG G3 9975
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 9827
  • LG G Flex2 9758
  • Sony Xperia Z3 8792
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 7749
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 7399
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 7002
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 6467
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 6172
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 5600

GFXBench puts the device’s GPU to the test. The PowerVR G6430 of the ZenFone 2 beat the scores of last year’s Adreno 330, but could’t quite match the output of the Adreno 430 found in today’s Snapdragon 810-equipped devices.

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 59
  • HTC One M9 49
  • LG G Flex2 49
  • LG G4 34.5
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 30
  • OnePlus One 28.3
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 28
  • Sony Xperia Z3 27.7
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 27
  • LG G3 26
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 26
  • Meizu m1 note 15
  • Oppo R7 15
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 14.2
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 14
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 5.3

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One M9 50
  • LG G Flex2 48
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 38
  • OnePlus One 30
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 30
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 30
  • Sony Xperia Z3 29.3
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 27
  • LG G4 24.7
  • LG G3 20
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 17
  • Meizu m1 note 16
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 15.1
  • Oppo R7 14.8
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 14
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 9.6

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 24
  • HTC One M9 23
  • LG G Flex2 22
  • LG G4 14.9
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 13
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 13
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 13
  • OnePlus One 12.1
  • Sony Xperia Z3 12
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 12
  • LG G3 11
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 6.2
  • Meizu m1 note 5.8
  • Oppo R7 5.7
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 5.7
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1.8

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One M9 24
  • LG G Flex2 22
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 14
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 13
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 13
  • OnePlus One 12.9
  • Sony Xperia Z3 12.7
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 12
  • LG G4 9.4
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 7.8
  • LG G3 7.7
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 6.2
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 6
  • Oppo R7 5.9
  • Meizu m1 note 5.7
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 3.9

Basemark X paints a similar picture. Once again the 4GB ZenFone 2 came up with a respectable score that’s worthy of a high-end smartphone.

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 27169
  • HTC One M9 19848
  • LG G Flex2 19360
  • LG G4 15090
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 13414
  • OnePlus One 13129
  • Sony Xperia Z3 12637
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 12565
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 12257
  • LG G3 10580
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 9111
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 4953
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 4875
  • Meizu m1 note 4617
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1915

Web browser performance turned out quite good as well. The range-topping ZenFone 2 handily beat its cheaper relative, as well as a number of considerably more expensive rivals.

Kraken 1.1

Lower is better

  • LG G4 4085
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 4154
  • LG G Flex2 4621
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 5057
  • HTC One M9 5500
  • Sony Xperia Z3 6355
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 6360
  • OnePlus One 7008
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 7023
  • LG G3 7632
  • Meizu MX4 Pro 10193
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 11439
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 13462
  • Meizu m1 note 15055
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 18124

BrowserMark 2.1

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 2718
  • LG G Flex2 2086
  • LG G4 1990
  • Asus ZenFone 2 (4GB of RAM) 1853
  • HTC One M9 1681
  • Sony Xperia Z3 1533
  • Asus Zenfone 2 (2GB of RAM) 1486
  • HTC One (M8) Lollipop 1460
  • LG G3 1453
  • Xiaomi Mi 4i 1396
  • Samsung Galaxy E7 1344
  • Alcatel Idol 3 (5.5) 1343
  • OnePlus One 1339
  • Meizu m1 note 536

Overall, the Asus ZenFone 2 delivered mostly impressive performance across the board, leaving many flagship devices behind it on more than one occasion. Considering its $300 price tag unlocked in the United States, we reckon that you will be hard-pressed to find more hardware oomph for the money.

Check out our full review of the Asus ZenFone 2 to find out everything else about the smartphone.

blog.gsmarena.com


Смотрите также