Intel atom x5 z8550
Intel x5-Z8550 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!| 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.84 GHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed |
| 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported |
| 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.53 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
| Jan, 2016 | vs | Apr, 2015 | Release date 9 months later |
| 279,050 MB/s | vs | 384.2 MB/s | More than 726.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score |
| 19.9 | vs | 13.4 | Around 50% better 3DMark06 CPU score |
| Intel x5-Z8550 Report a correction | Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 Report a correction |
cpuboss.com
Intel Atom x5-Z8550
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 - 4-core processor with a clock frequency of 1440 MHz and 2rd level cache 2048 KB. Processor is designed for mobile computers, installs in a BGA1380. Has a built-in memory controller (2 channels, LPDDR3-1600) and controller PCI Express 2.0 (2 lines).
| Essentials: | |
| Released | 2016 |
| Segment | for mobile computers |
| Socket | BGA1380 |
| Number of cores | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 |
| Base frequency | 1440 MHz |
| Turbo Boost | 2400 MHz |
| Unlocked multiplier | no |
| Architecture (core) | Cherry Trail |
| Lithography | 14 nm |
| TDP | 2 W |
| Max. temperature | 90° C |
| Official specifications | follow > |
| Internal memory | |
| L1 Cache, Кb | 4x32 + 4x24 |
| L2 Cache, Кb | 2048 |
| L3 Cache, Кb | no |
| Integrated moduls | |
| Graphics processor | Intel HD Graphics 400200 - 600 MHz |
| Memory controller | 2-channel(LPDDR3-1600) |
| PCIe controller | PCI Express 2.0 (2 lines) |
| Other modules / peripherals | • eMMC controller• I2C controller• Image Signal Processor• Legacy I/O• SDIO controller• SPI controller• Trusted Execution Engine Interface• UART• Unified Video Decoder (UVD)• USB controller• Video Coding Engine (VCE) |
| Instructions, technology | |
| • MMX• SSE• SSE2• SSE3• SSSE3• SSE4 (SSE4.1 + SSE4.2) | • AES (Advanced Encryption Standard inst.)• EM64T (Intel 64)• NX (XD, Execute disable bit)• VT-x2 (Virtualization technology)• BPT (Burst Performance tech.)• Enhanced SpeedStep tech. |
( ~ 2 600 models )
Processors rating( + specifications )
Graphics card comparison( ~ 600 models )
Graphics card rating( + specifications )
www.chaynikam.info
Atom x5-Z8550
The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 20,774,557 CPUs tested.
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming Desktop Workstation CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USBHow it works
- - Download and run UserBenchMark.
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- - See speed test results from other users.
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
- - Share your opinion by voting.
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
| Description | Intel® Atom™ x5-Z8550 Processor (2M Cache, up to 2.40 GHz) |
| Code Name | Cherry Trail |
| Launch Date | Q1'16 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8550 |
| # of Cores | 4 |
| # of Threads | 4 |
| Burst Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| Cache | 2 MB |
| Instruction Set | 64-bit |
| Embedded Options Available | No |
| Lithography | 14 nm |
| Recommended Price | $27.00 |
| Clock Speed | 1.44 GHz |
| Scenario Design Power | 2 W |
| Product Brief | Link |
| Processor Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 400 |
| Graphics Base Frequency | 200.00 MHz |
| Graphics Burst Frequency | 600.00 MHz |
| Wireless Display | Yes |
| # of Displays Supported | 3 |
| Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency | 600.00 MHz |
| Graphics Video Max Memory | 8 GB |
| Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
| Memory Types | LPDDR3 1600 |
| Memory Channels | 2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s |
| USB Revision | 3.0 |
| # of USB Ports | 3 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 |
| PCI Express Configurations | 2x1, 1x2 |
| Max # of PCI Express Lanes | 2 |
| Turbo Boost 3.0 Tech | No |
| Virtualization Tech (VT-x) | Yes |
| Intel 64 | Yes |
| vPro Tech | No |
| Identity Protection Tech | Yes |
| Secure Boot | Yes |
| Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | No |
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm |
| Sockets Supported | UTFCBGA1380 |
cpu.userbenchmark.com
Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
► removeThe Intel Atom x5-Z8550 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in February 2016. It is clocked at 1.44 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s). Compared to the previous year x5-Z8500, the boost clock speed gained 160 MHz (from 2.24 to 2.4 GHz).
Architecture
The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.
Performance
Compared to the Atom x7-Z8700, the Atom x5-Z8550 offers a similar boost speed and should therefore perform on a similar level. Compared to ARM-based SoCs it should offer a similar performance as a Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 (CPU wise).
Using Windows, the chip is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet or Office, but not for very complex software or modern games.
Graphics
The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) was renamed to Intel HD Graphics 400 in this generation. It is still based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and will handle older and less demandig Windows games (e.g. Counter-Strike: GO) in very low settings at decent frame rates. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.
Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance similar to the Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.
Power Consumption
The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.
► removeThe Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.84 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).
Architecture
The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.
Performance
Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8300 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801.
Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.
Graphics
The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.
Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.
Power Consumption
The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 855 avg: 920.1 median: 942 (10%) max: 951 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 2135 avg: 2831.1 median: 2934 (4%) max: 2975 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 9720 avg: 11107.5 median: 11107 (7%) max: 12495 Points
min: 12054 avg: 13586 median: 13575 (16%) max: 15139 Points
| Chuwi Hi12 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 500 / 800 MHz | 20.19.15.4331 | 12054 |
| Chuwi Vi8 Plus (CWI519) | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 500 / 800 MHz | 20.19.15.4331 | 12587 |
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 14564 | ||
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 15139 |
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 1276 avg: 1355 median: 1355 (4%) max: 1434 Points
min: 1086 avg: 1154 median: 1154 (14%) max: 1222 Points
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 1086 | ||
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 1222 |
1210 Points (26%)
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 1210 |
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
2352 Points (6%)
| Chuwi Hi12 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 500 / 800 MHz | 20.19.15.4331 | 2352 |
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
809 Points (16%)
| Chuwi Hi12 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 500 / 800 MHz | 20.19.15.4331 | 809 |
3703 Points (29%)
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 3703 |
min: 856 avg: 1853.8 median: 2129 (7%) max: 2300 Points
| VOYO VBook V3 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 856 | ||
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 1971 | ||
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 2288 | ||
| Chuwi Hi12 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 500 / 800 MHz | 20.19.15.4331 | 2300 |
min: 805 avg: 877 median: 886 (15%) max: 930 Points
| VOYO VBook V3 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 805 | ||
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 867 | ||
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 906 | ||
| Chuwi Hi12 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 500 / 800 MHz | 20.19.15.4331 | 930 |
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score
5668 Points (2%)
| Chuwi Hi12 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 500 / 800 MHz | 20.19.15.4331 | 5668 |
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 491 avg: 506 median: 505 (6%) max: 522 ms
min: 57914 avg: 61777.5 median: 61777 (21%) max: 65641 Points
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 57914 | ||
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 65641 |
min: 4885 avg: 5059 median: 5059 (26%) max: 5233 Points
| Chuwi Hi10 Pro | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 4096 | 4885 | ||
| Medion Lifetab P10505 | HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | 2048 | 5233 |
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
#0 checking url part for id 8305 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 6677 +0s ... 0s
#2 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 06 Oct 2019 15:08:40 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#3 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.149s ... 0.15s
#4 min, max, avg, median took s +0.165s ... 0.315s
#5 return log +0.009s ... 0.325s
www.notebookcheck.net
