Главная » Разные статьи » Amd radeon r5 340

Amd radeon r5 340


سعر ومواصفات AMD Radeon R5 340

September 07, 2018 - 12:12 am admin AMD

  • من سلسلة : AMD Radeon 300 .
  • حجم الذاكرة : 2GB جيجا بايت GDDR5 .
  • معمارية الكارت : 128 بت .
  • سعة نقل البيانات : 72 جيجا بايت في الثانية .

سعر ومواصفات كارت الشاشة AMD Radeon R5 340 تقدمه اليكم شركة AMD الامريكية في سلسلة Radeon 300 الذي تم الاعلان عنه في يوم 5 مايو من عام 2015 ، حيث يأتي بذاكرة عشوائية بسعة 2GB جيجا بايت GDDR5، ويصل سعة نقل البيانات الي 72 جيجا بايت في الثانية و بمعمارية 128 بت ، وبسرعات معالجة Base Clock بسرعة 730 ميجا هيرتز و Memory Clock بسرعة 780 ميجا هيرتز ، ويدعم الكارت تقنية AMD HD3D و AMD PowerPlay و AMD PowerTune w/ Boost و AMD ZeroCore Power ، واليكم كافة تفاصيل الكرت .
إمكانيات الكرت
حجم الذاكرة 2GB جيجا بايت GDDR5
سرعات المعالجة Stream Processors :384 Base Clock بسرعة 800 ميجا هيرتز Boost Clock بسرعة 825 ميجا هيرتز

Memory Clock بسرعة 1125 ميجا هيرتز

معمارية كرت 128 بت
سعة نقل البيانات 72 جيجا بايت في الثانية
نوع الكرت مكتبي
واجهة الكارت PCI-Express 3.0 x8
تاريخ الإعلان 5 مايو من عام 2015
دعم التكنولوجيا
الواقع الافتراضي VR Ready لايدعم
اصدار دايركت إكس DirectX 11.2
اصدار OpenGL 4.4
اصدار OpenCL 1.2
اصدار Shader Model 5.0
دعم تكنولوجيا اخري AMD HD3D و AMD PowerPlay و AMD PowerTune w/ Boost و AMD ZeroCore Power
دعم الشاشة
منافذ الكرت VGA DVI-I DualLink HDMI
دعم الشاشات المتعددة لايدعم
المواصفات الحرارية والطاقة
إمداد الطاقة الموصى به 350 وات
في مصر لم يحدد السعر بعد
في السعودية لم يحدد السعر بعد
ملاحظه : قد تختلف مواصفات كارت الشاشة في بعض البلدان العربية عن بعضها لذلك تأكد قبل الشراء ولا نضمن صحة المواصفات بنسبة 100 % في حالة وجود اخطاء اتصل بنا.

www.nologygate.com

Radeon R5 340

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

GPU brand GPU name Market Clock speed Turbo clock speed Is dual GPU Reference card
AMD
Oland
Desktop
800 MHz
825 MHz
No
None
Shading units Texture mapping units Render output processors Compute units Pixel rate Texture rate Floating-point performance
384
24
8
6
6.6 GPixel/s
19.8 GTexel/s
633.6 GFLOPS
Memory clock speed Effective memory clock speed Memory bus Memory Memory type Memory bandwidth
1,125 MHz
4,500 MHz
128 bit
2,048 MB
GDDR5
72 GB/s

Report a correction

gpuboss.com

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 230

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Buy on Amazon Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 3.7x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
  • 3x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 594 vs 539
  • 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1054 vs 247
  • 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23626 vs 4127
  • 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 439
  • 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 439
  • 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2923 vs 666
  • 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2923 vs 666
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1273
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1273

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230

  • 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230

PassMark - G2D Mark
PassMark - G3D Mark
Geekbench - OpenCL
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

Compare specifications (specs)

askgeek.io

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM and AMD Radeon R5 M315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Buy on Amazon Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
  • 4.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 594 vs 569
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1054 vs 609
  • Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23626 vs 14110
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 780
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 780

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M315

  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 970 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 23.28 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 745.0 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M315

PassMark - G2D Mark
PassMark - G3D Mark
Geekbench - OpenCL
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

Compare specifications (specs)

askgeek.io

Смотрите также