Adreno 505 vs 405


Snapdragon 430 (+Adreno 505) vs Snapdragon 617 (+Adreno 405) – performance, benchmarks and temperatures

Back in late 2015 Qualcomm officially announced Snapdragon 430 and Snapdragon 617. We already had the chance to test both of them and that is why we want to make a quick comparison between the two. Just like Snapdragon 4XX, Snapdragon 6XX CPUs are built for mid-range devices. Nonetheless, the Snapdragon 6XX series products are found in more expensive models and they are expected to provide better performance. To conduct this comparison we used Lenovo K6 with Snapdragon 430 and Motorola Moto G4, which is one of the cheapest smartphones with Snapdragon 617.

You can check the two models over here: Lenovo K6: Buy from Amazon.com Moto G4: Buy from Amazon.com

Spec sheets
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
CPU 28 nm
Cores 8
Frequency 1.4 GHz
Architecture ARM Cortex-A53 / 64-bit support
Graphics card Adreno 505
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617
CPU 28 nm
Cores 8
Frequency 1.21 GHz – 1.52 GHz
Architecture ARM Cortex-A53 / 64-bit support
Graphics card Adreno 405 / 550 MHz

The first smartphones running the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8952 hit the market in the second half of the last year. Lenovo K6 is the first device with this chipset that we have tested. Snapdragon 430 is a 64-bit mobile processor built on the 28nm process technology. The CPU has eight Cortex-A53 cores with a maximum frequency of 1.4GHz. It’s specs include Full HD display support, up to 21MP camera sensors with up to Full HD video capturing (30fps), Quick Charge 3.0 technology for faster recharging ( 38% more effective than Quick Charge 2.0), Wi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1, NFC and LTE Cat 4 with download speeds of up to 150Mbps. The chip also includes the Adreno 505 graphics card which brings a major step up in graphics capabilities compared to its predecessor.

You can find more information about the Snapdragon 430 at Qualcomm’s official web page: https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/430

On the other side of the ring, we have the Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 which is found in the Moto G4. This chip is also manufactured by Qualcomm and it offers us eight Cortex-A53 cores grouped into two equal parts. There is a small difference in their clock speeds. The first four are clocked at 1.21 GHz, while the second four have a frequency of 1.52GHz. Snapdragon 617 is a 64-bit mobile CPU built on the 28nm process technology as well. QuickCharge 3.0 technology is also present (up to 38% more effective than QuickCharge 2.0) and it provides four times faster recharge times than the convenient charging. Specs also include the support of LTE Cat. 7 with a download speed of up to 300 Mbps, Wi-Fi 802.11n/ac, LPDDR3 933MHz memory, Bluetooth 4.1, Full HD display, up to 21MP cameras with Full HD video capturing at 60fps. The SoC uses the Adreno 405 graphics card clocked at 550MHz.

You can find more information about the Snapdragon 617 at Qualcomm’s official web page: https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/617

Benchmark scores

The two chips provide smooth performance but the comparison is interesting for sure. To compare the two chips we conducted a few benchmarks that test both the CPU performance (first four tests) and the GPU capabilities as well (last four tests). You can see the results in the table below. It comes to our attention, that while the CPU performance is notably better on the Snapdragon 617 the GPU performance is on par.

Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 Qualcomm Snapdragon 617
Geekbench 3 (Multi-Core) 2478 2700 (+9%)
Vellamo 2 Metal 710 937 (+32%)
Vellamo 3 Metal 1065 1469 (+38%)
Pi – 10 mil. (lower is better) 33.212 32.746
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex (offscreen) 16 17 (+6%)
GFXBench 3 Manhattan (offscreen) 7.1 (+7%) 6.6
GFXBench 3.1 Manhattan (offscreen) 4.4 (+2%) 4.3
3D Mark Ice Unlimited 9581 9853 (+3%)
External temperatures

Smartphones with Snapdragon 4XX SoC have always performed well in our temperature tests. Because of this, we were not surprised when Lenovo K6 stayed cool after continuous use. The hottest point remained at just 34.3 degrees Celsius. it’s another story when ot comes to Moto G4 and its Snapdragon 617 where temperatures raised to 44.8C. We should note that these are the highest temperature points recorded and they are that high just because they were registered immediately after continuous 3D gaming (simulated by the Epic Citadel app). The mobile chip is not the only thing that affects the overall temperature of a device so these results are more of a marker rather than actual numbers that you will get on a different smartphone.

You can check the prices of both smartphones over here: Lenovo K6: Buy from Amazon.com Moto G4: Buy from Amazon.com

laptopmedia.com

Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.

Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 405 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was announced in 2014 and is used in SoCs like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 415, 425, 610 or 615. Depending on the used SoC and device, the clock rate of the Adreno 405 is around 550 MHz. 

The Adreno 405 features 48 ALUs (unified shaders) and supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.2 (Feature Level 11_1).

The performance of the Adreno 405 reaches only 40 % of the high end Adreno 420 (in the Snapdragon 805). This means its on a level with the older Adreno 320 and the PowerVR G6200.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506, the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.

5627 Points (1%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz5627

10835 Points (1%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz10835
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 510 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505

33.5 fps (56%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz33.52

8015 fps (18%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz8015
- - * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

#0 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6151 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s

#3 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:38:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +1.628s ... 1.651s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.399s ... 2.051s

#7 Before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 2.051s

#8 Got 86 rows for game benchmarks. +0.188s ... 2.24s

#9 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.24s

#10 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 2.249s

#11 return log +0.092s ... 2.341s

www.notebookcheck.net

Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506, the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 405 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was announced in 2014 and is used in SoCs like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 415, 425, 610 or 615. Depending on the used SoC and device, the clock rate of the Adreno 405 is around 550 MHz. 

The Adreno 405 features 48 ALUs (unified shaders) and supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.2 (Feature Level 11_1).

The performance of the Adreno 405 reaches only 40 % of the high end Adreno 420 (in the Snapdragon 805). This means its on a level with the older Adreno 320 and the PowerVR G6200.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 418 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 SoC and was announced in mid 2014. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11 feature level 11_1 (with hardware tessellation). The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender to intelligently switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering.

Compared to the Adreno 420, the performance of the 418 is about 20 percent slower (at 600 MHz). This puts the Adreno 418 in the upper middle class in 2015 and even demanding (Android) games should run fluently.

10381 Points (1%)

Xiaomi Mi 4s808 MSM89922804 10381

1689 Points (13%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1689

2012 Points (7%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 2012

1193 Points (19%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1193

1207 Points (14%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1207
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 418 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 418

1.8 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL1.8

1 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL1

3.1 fps (2%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL3.1

2.9 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL2.9

7.2 fps (2%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 7.2

12793 fps (29%)

Xiaomi Mi 4s808 MSM89922804 12793
- - * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

#0 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6151 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6309 +0s ... 0s

#3 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:38:15 +0200 +0.046s ... 0.046s

#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.16s ... 0.207s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.949s ... 1.156s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.412s ... 1.568s

#7 Before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.568s

#8 Got 96 rows for game benchmarks. +0.163s ... 1.731s

#9 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.731s

#10 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.133s ... 1.864s

#11 return log +0.111s ... 1.975s

www.notebookcheck.net

Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506, the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 405 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was announced in 2014 and is used in SoCs like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 415, 425, 610 or 615. Depending on the used SoC and device, the clock rate of the Adreno 405 is around 550 MHz. 

The Adreno 405 features 48 ALUs (unified shaders) and supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.2 (Feature Level 11_1).

The performance of the Adreno 405 reaches only 40 % of the high end Adreno 420 (in the Snapdragon 805). This means its on a level with the older Adreno 320 and the PowerVR G6200.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.

Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 510 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510

1.8 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL1.8

1 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL1

3.1 fps (2%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL3.1

2.9 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL2.9

44.8 fps (75%)

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro652 MSM89764096 44.76

15120 fps (34%)

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro652 MSM89764096 15120

26078 fps (58%)

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro652 MSM89764096 26078

6078 Points (29%)

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro652 MSM89764096 6078

2559 Points (41%)

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro652 MSM89764096 2559

4270 points (93%)

Lenovo Phab 2 Pro652 MSM89764096 4270
- - * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

#0 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6151 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s

#3 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:38:15 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.02s ... 0.022s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +1.223s ... 1.245s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.392s ... 1.637s

#7 Before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.638s

#8 Got 86 rows for game benchmarks. +0.254s ... 1.892s

#9 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.892s

#10 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.06s ... 1.951s

#11 return log +0.093s ... 2.044s

www.notebookcheck.net

Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506, the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 418 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 SoC and was announced in mid 2014. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11 feature level 11_1 (with hardware tessellation). The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender to intelligently switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering.

Compared to the Adreno 420, the performance of the 418 is about 20 percent slower (at 600 MHz). This puts the Adreno 418 in the upper middle class in 2015 and even demanding (Android) games should run fluently.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 405 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was announced in 2014 and is used in SoCs like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 415, 425, 610 or 615. Depending on the used SoC and device, the clock rate of the Adreno 405 is around 550 MHz. 

The Adreno 405 features 48 ALUs (unified shaders) and supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.2 (Feature Level 11_1).

The performance of the Adreno 405 reaches only 40 % of the high end Adreno 420 (in the Snapdragon 805). This means its on a level with the older Adreno 320 and the PowerVR G6200.

10381 Points (1%)

Xiaomi Mi 4s808 MSM89922804 10381

1689 Points (13%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1689

2012 Points (7%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 2012

1193 Points (19%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1193

1207 Points (14%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1207
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 418 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 418 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 405

1.8 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL1.8

1 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL1

3.1 fps (2%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL3.1

2.9 fps (1%)

Motorola Moto X Play615 MSM89392048  OpenGL2.9

7.2 fps (2%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 7.2

12793 fps (29%)

Xiaomi Mi 4s808 MSM89922804 12793
- - * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

#0 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6309 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6151 +0s ... 0s

#3 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:38:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +1.264s ... 1.286s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.385s ... 1.671s

#7 Before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.671s

#8 Got 96 rows for game benchmarks. +0.238s ... 1.909s

#9 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.909s

#10 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.043s ... 1.951s

#11 return log +0.109s ... 2.06s

www.notebookcheck.net

Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 405 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was announced in 2014 and is used in SoCs like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 415, 425, 610 or 615. Depending on the used SoC and device, the clock rate of the Adreno 405 is around 550 MHz. 

The Adreno 405 features 48 ALUs (unified shaders) and supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.2 (Feature Level 11_1).

The performance of the Adreno 405 reaches only 40 % of the high end Adreno 420 (in the Snapdragon 805). This means its on a level with the older Adreno 320 and the PowerVR G6200.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506, the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 418 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 SoC and was announced in mid 2014. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11 feature level 11_1 (with hardware tessellation). The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender to intelligently switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering.

Compared to the Adreno 420, the performance of the 418 is about 20 percent slower (at 600 MHz). This puts the Adreno 418 in the upper middle class in 2015 and even demanding (Android) games should run fluently.

5627 Points (1%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz5627

10381 Points (1%)

Xiaomi Mi 4s808 MSM89922804 10381

10835 Points (1%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz10835

1689 Points (13%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1689

2012 Points (7%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 2012

1193 Points (19%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1193

1207 Points (14%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 1207
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 418 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 405 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 418

7.2 fps (2%)

BlackBerry Priv808 MSM89923072 7.2

33.5 fps (56%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz33.52

8015 fps (18%)

ZTE Blade V84353072 450 /  MHz8015

12793 fps (29%)

Xiaomi Mi 4s808 MSM89922804 12793
- - * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

#0 checking url part for id 6151 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6309 +0s ... 0s

#3 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2019 17:38:15 +0200 +0.035s ... 0.035s

#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.247s ... 0.282s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.887s ... 1.169s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.367s ... 1.536s

#7 Before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 1.537s

#8 Got 96 rows for game benchmarks. +0.132s ... 1.669s

#9 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.669s

#10 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 1.678s

#11 return log +0.261s ... 1.939s

www.notebookcheck.net


Смотрите также